We had the opportunity of read the review article of
Goldenstein-Schainberg et al.1 about the most important
aspects of psoriatic arthritis (PA) over the years. Related
to the therapeutic aspects, it is concluded that biologic
agents, especially TNF inhibitors (infliximab, etarnecept,
adalimumab and golimumab), are used as drugs of last
line in refractory cases of the disease. Then, based on existing
literature, we show our agreement in this last statement.2,3
However, we consider important to mention alternative
therapies. In the clinical trial of Griffiths et al., the autors
studied 900 patients with PA who didn’t respond to
treatment with one biologic agent. In order to get a better
clinical response, they compared two biologic agents:
ustekinumab – last biologic agent (monoclonal antibody)
approved in 2009 – and etanercept. As a result, they found
that patients with ustekinumab had a better and faster
clinical response, with both dermatological and joint
improvement.4 Cuchacovich reported the same comparison
in 2011 and reassured the findings of Griffiths with
ustekinumab.2 Furthermore, in the case report of Cuchacovich,
the clinical improvement was demonstrated with the
use of the combination of the two biologic agents mentioned
earlier: ustekinumab and etanercept.3 Above all,
to demonstrate the safety of ustekinumab, Cuchacovich
reported its use in patients who were refractory to phototherapy,
systemic corticosteroids and biologic therapy (including
TNF inhibitors). The result not only was favorable
but also improved the clinical response in the psoriasis
area and in the severity index.2
Authors: Vega-Villanueva, Karen; Cortez-Bazán, Nathaly; Alvarado-Molina, Angela
Source: Rev. Bras. Reumatol
URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10757/314834
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario