Objectives. We aimed to assess if Caesarean section is a risk factor for overnutrition
in early- and late-childhood, and to assess the magnitude of the effect of child- versus
family-related variables in these risk estimates.
Methods. Longitudinal data from Peruvian children from the Young Lives Study
was used. Outcomes assessed were overweight, obesity, overnutrition (overweight
plus obesity), and central obesity (waist circumference) at the age 5 (first follow-up)
and 7 (second follow-up) years. The exposure of interests was delivery by Caesarean
section. Relative risks (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated
using multivariable models adjusted for child-related (e.g., birth weight) and familyrelated
(e.g., maternal nutritional status) variables.
Results. At baseline, mean age was 11.7 (± 3.5) months and 50.1% were boys.
Children born by Caesarean section were 15.6%. The 10.5% of the children were
overweight and 2.4% were obese. For the obesity outcome, data from 6,038 and
9,625 children-years was included from baseline to the first and second follow-up,
respectively. Compared to those who did not experience Caesarean delivery, the risk
of having obesity was higher in the group born by Caesarean: RRs were higher at
early-childhood (first follow-up: 2.25; 95% CI [1.36–3.74]) than later in life (second
follow-up: 1.57; 95% CI [1.02–2.41]). Family-related variables had a greater effect in
attenuating the risk estimates for obesity at the first, than at the second follow-up.
Conclusion. Our results suggest a higher probability of developing obesity, but not
overweight, among children born by Caesarean section delivery. The magnitude of
risk estimates decreased over time, and family-related variables had a stronger effect
on the risk estimates at early-childhood.
Authors: Carrillo Larco, Rodrigo M.; Miranda, J. Jaime; Bernabe Ortiz, Antonio
Source: Peerj
URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10757/558501
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario