Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) is a major cause of childhood diarrhea. The present study sought
to determine the prevalence and distribution of toxin types, colonization factors (CFs), and antimicrobial
susceptibility of ETEC strains isolated from Peruvian children. We analyzed ETEC strains isolated from
Peruvian children between 2 and 24 months of age in a passive surveillance study. Five E. coli colonies per
patient were studied by multiplex real-time PCR to identify ETEC virulence factors. ETEC-associated toxins
were confirmed using a GM1-based enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Confirmed strains were tested for
CFs by dot blot assay using 21 monoclonal antibodies. We analyzed 1,129 samples from children with diarrhea
and 744 control children and found ETEC in 5.3% and 4.3%, respectively. ETEC was more frequently isolated
from children >12 months of age than from children <12 months of age (P < 0.001). Fifty-two percent of ETEC
isolates from children with diarrhea and 72% of isolates from controls were heat-labile enterotoxin (LT)
positive and heat-stable enterotoxin (ST) negative; 25% and 19%, respectively, were LT negative and ST
positive; and 23% and 9%, respectively, were LT positive and ST positive. CFs were identified in 64% of
diarrheal samples and 37% of control samples (P < 0.05). The most common CFs were CS6 (14% and 7%,
respectively), CS12 (12% and 4%, respectively), and CS1 (9% and 4%, respectively). ST-producing ETEC
strains caused more severe diarrhea than non-ST-producing ETEC strains. The strains were most frequently
resistant to ampicillin (71%) and co-trimoxazole (61%). ETEC was thus found to be more prevalent in older
infants. LT was the most common toxin type; 64% of strains had an identified CF. These data are relevant in
estimating the burden of disease due to ETEC and the potential coverage of children in Peru by investigational
vaccines.
Authors: Rivera, F. P.; Ochoa, T. J.; Maves, R. C.; Bernal, M.; Medina, A. M.; Meza, R.; Barletta, F.; Mercado, E.; Ecker, L.;Gil, A. I.; Hall, E. R.; Huicho, L.; Lanata, C. F.
Source: J. Clin. Microbiol
URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10757/314292
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario