We had the opportunity of read the review article of
Goldenstein-Schainberg et al.1 about the most important
aspects of psoriatic arthritis (PA) over the years. Related
to the therapeutic aspects, it is concluded that biologic
agents, especially TNF inhibitors (infliximab, etarnecept,
adalimumab and golimumab), are used as drugs of last
line in refractory cases of the disease. Then, based on existing
literature, we show our agreement in this last statement.2,3
However, we consider important to mention alternative
therapies. In the clinical trial of Griffiths et al., the autors
studied 900 patients with PA who didn’t respond to
treatment with one biologic agent. In order to get a better
clinical response, they compared two biologic agents:
ustekinumab – last biologic agent (monoclonal antibody)
approved in 2009 – and etanercept. As a result, they found
that patients with ustekinumab had a better and faster
clinical response, with both dermatological and joint
improvement.4 Cuchacovich reported the same comparison
in 2011 and reassured the findings of Griffiths with
ustekinumab.2 Furthermore, in the case report of Cuchacovich,
the clinical improvement was demonstrated with the
use of the combination of the two biologic agents mentioned
earlier: ustekinumab and etanercept.3 Above all,
to demonstrate the safety of ustekinumab, Cuchacovich
reported its use in patients who were refractory to phototherapy,
systemic corticosteroids and biologic therapy (including
TNF inhibitors). The result not only was favorable
but also improved the clinical response in the psoriasis
area and in the severity index.2
Authors: Vega-Villanueva, Karen; Cortez-Bazán, Nathaly; Alvarado-Molina, Angela
Source: Rev. Bras. Reumatol
URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10757/314834
Producción académica de de la Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas - UPC
martes, 7 de julio de 2015
Early medical student contact with their health situation. A Peruvian experience.
Recientemente, Baños et al [1] publicaron en Educación
Médica la experiencia piloto del nuevo grado
conjunto de medicina de la Universitat Autònoma
de Barcelona y la Universitat Pompeu Fabra en
relación con la exposición precoz a la realidad sociosanitaria
de los estudiantes y su satisfacción.
Nuestra experiencia en la Escuela de Medicina de la
Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud de la Universidad
Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas, en Lima, ratifica lo
planteado por los autores.
Desde hace cuatro años, como parte del plan de
estudios, los alumnos del primer semestre visitan
los diferentes centros asistenciales correspondientes
al campo clínico de nuestra escuela. Estas visitas
están dirigidas principalmente a que los alumnos
logren cuatro objetivos: conocer el sistema de salud
peruano, sensibilizar al alumno con la realidad del
paciente como persona que sufre, iniciar el desarrollo
de la competencia de comunicación y conocer
los determinantes de la salud en nuestro medio.
Autores: Bermúdez García, Alejandro; Mory Arciniega, Claudia
Fuente: Educ. méd
URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10757/314584
Autores: Bermúdez García, Alejandro; Mory Arciniega, Claudia
Fuente: Educ. méd
URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10757/314584
Importancia de la enseñanza de la medicina basada en evidencias.
Sr. Editor:
Tal como se han reseñado en este espacio otros
eventos de educación médica continua (1) y se ha
resaltado la importancia de nuevos aspectos útiles
para el médico en el campo de la atención individual y
colectiva (2), consideramos pertinente brindar algunos
alcances acerca de la Medicina Basada en Evidencias
(MBE) en virtud a su relevancia como instrumento
valioso en el quehacer profesional. Recientemente,
la Facultad de Medicina de la Universidad Central de
Venezuela (UCV) tuvo la oportunidad de organizar
el Simposio Internacional Principios Básicos de
la Medicina Basada en Evidencias (SIPBMBE),
desarrollado el 12 de febrero de 2010 en el Auditorio
Lorenzo Campins y Ballester, del Decanato de
Medicina de la Ciudad Universitaria, desarrollado
por el Departamento de Medicina Preventiva y Social
de la Escuela de Medicina Luis Razetti de esa casa
superior de estudios.
Autores: Rodríguez Morales, Alfonso J.; Mezones Holguin, Edward; Tolentino Silva, Marcus; Puebla, Sergio; Orellana, Juan J.;Cárcamo, Daniel; Nunes da Silva, Everton; Risquez Parra, Alejandro; Echezuria Marval, Luis; Mayta Tristán, Percy
Fuente: Gac Méd Caracas
URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10757/314583
Autores: Rodríguez Morales, Alfonso J.; Mezones Holguin, Edward; Tolentino Silva, Marcus; Puebla, Sergio; Orellana, Juan J.;Cárcamo, Daniel; Nunes da Silva, Everton; Risquez Parra, Alejandro; Echezuria Marval, Luis; Mayta Tristán, Percy
Fuente: Gac Méd Caracas
URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10757/314583
Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics
Data are increasingly used to govern science. Research evaluations that were once bespoke and performed by peers are now routine and reliant on metrics1. The problem is that evaluation is now led by the data rather than by judgement. Metrics have proliferated: usually well intentioned, not always well informed, often ill applied. We risk damaging the system with the very tools designed to improve it, as evaluation is increasingly implemented by organizations without knowledge of, or advice on, good practice and interpretation.
Before 2000, there was the Science Citation Index on CD-ROM from the Institute for Scientific Information (ISI), used by experts for specialist analyses. In 2002, Thomson Reuters launched an integrated web platform, making the Web of Science database widely accessible. Competing citation indices were created: Elsevier's Scopus (released in 2004) and Google Scholar (beta version released in 2004). Web-based tools to easily compare institutional research productivity and impact were introduced, such as InCites (using the Web of Science) and SciVal (using Scopus), as well as software to analyse individual citation profiles using Google Scholar (Publish or Perish, released in 2007).
Authors: Diana Hicks, Paul Wouters, Ludo Waltman, Sarah de Rijcke& Ismael Rafols
Source: Nature
URL: Full text
lunes, 6 de julio de 2015
Characteristics of gastroduodenal ulcers in patients with negative biopsies for Helicobacter pylori.
Objetives. To evaluate the clinical, epidemiological
and endoscopic characteristics of the Helicobacter pylori
(Hp) negative peptic ulcer disease. Methods. In this
cross sectional study we included 651 patients diagnosed
of peptic ulcer disease between January 2000 and
December 2005. The diagnosis of Hp infection was
established by histology. Clinical and epidemiological
characteristics of patients with and without Hp infection
were compared. Results. Males prevailed (69%).
Hp negative ulcers were older (57,73 +/- 19,44 years
old vs 50,26 +/- 18, 64 years old, P < 0.001). Clinical
characteristics did not differ among both groups. Duodenal
ulcer prevailed in Hp positive patients (56,5%)
and gastric ulcer in Hp negative patients (53,5%).
Multiple ulcers and intestinal metaplasia were more
frequently found in Hp negative cases [9.3% vs 4.5
% (P = 0,015) and 34.5% vs 22.1% (P = 0,001),
respectively]. Conclusion. Hp negative peptic ulcer disease
is found in older patients, with a higher frequency
of gastric ulcers, multiple lesions and intestinal metaplasia.
Authors: Montes Teves, Pedro; Salazar Ventura, Sonia; Monge Salgado, Eduardo
Source: Acta Gastroenterol Latinoam
URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10757/314561
Authors: Montes Teves, Pedro; Salazar Ventura, Sonia; Monge Salgado, Eduardo
Source: Acta Gastroenterol Latinoam
URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10757/314561
Suscribirse a:
Comentarios (Atom)