Introduction: Pneumococcal pneumonia (PP) has a high burden of morbimortality in children. Use of pneumococcal conjugate vaccines
(PCVs) is an effective preventive measure. After PCV 7-valent (PCV7) withdrawal, PCV 10-valent (PCV10) and PCV 13-valent (PCV13)
are the alternatives in Peru. This study aimed to evaluate cost effectiveness of these vaccines in preventing PP in Peruvian children <5 yearsold.
Methodology: A cost-effectiveness analysis was developed in three phases: a systematic evidence search for calculating effectiveness; a cost
analysis for vaccine strategies and outcome management; and an economic model based on decision tree analysis, including deterministic and
probabilistic sensitivity analysis using acceptability curves, tornado diagram, and Monte Carlo simulation. A hypothetic 100 vaccinated
children/vaccine cohort was built. An incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated.
Results: The isolation probability for all serotypes in each vaccine was estimated: 38% for PCV7, 41% PCV10, and 17% PCV13. Avoided
hospitalization was found to be the best effectiveness model measure. Estimated costs for PCV7, PCV10, and PCV13 cohorts were
USD13,761, 11,895, and 12,499, respectively. Costs per avoided hospitalization were USD718 for PCV7, USD333 for PCV10, andUSD 162
for PCV13. At ICER, PCV7 was dominated by the other PCVs. Eliminating PCV7, PCV13 was more cost effective than PCV10 (confirmed
in sensitivity analysis).
Conclusions: PCV10 and PCV13 are more cost effective than PCV7 in prevention of pneumonia in children <5 years-old in Peru. PCV13
prevents more hospitalizations and is more cost-effective than PCV10. These results should be considered when making decisions about the
Peruvian National Inmunizations Schedule.
Authors: Mezones Holguin, Edward; Bolaños Díaz, Rafael; Fiestas, Víctor; Sanabria, César; Gutiérrez Aguado, Alfonso; Fiestas, Fabián; Suárez, Víctor J.; Rodríguez Morales, Alfonso J.; Hernandez, Adrian V.
Source: The Journal of Infection in Developing Countries
URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10757/337985
Producción académica de de la Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas - UPC
viernes, 24 de julio de 2015
jueves, 23 de julio de 2015
Differences in survival between patients with systemic lupus erythematosus from a public and a private center
Sr. Editor:
Hemos leído con atención el artículo publicado por el servicio de Reumatología del Hospital José María Cullen de Santa Fe, Argentina1. Nos parece relevante la comparación de la evolución del lupus eritematoso sistémico (LES) en un centro privado y uno público, ya que el desenlace de esta enfermedad se podría ver afectado por diversos factores que involucran estar en cualquiera de los centros mencionados, como el tratamiento farmacológico brindado y las características demográficas de la persona que acude a un centro público y uno privado. Estos factores influyen en la calidad de vida y el grado de actividad de la enfermedad en el paciente2. Sin embargo, el estudio presentado tiene algunas limitaciones que ponen en tela de juicio los resultados reportados. En primer lugar, no se define el momento en que los autores inician el seguimiento de enfermedad de los pacientes. Esto podría sesgar el estudio ya que el pronóstico de supervivencia de LES varía de acuerdo con varios factores, como el grado de actividad de la enfermedad en la que se encuentra la persona, la edad y las comorbilidades en el momento de diagnóstico, entre otras3. Segundo, no se determina si los pacientes son usuarios exclusivos de uno de los sistemas de salud (público o privado), si tienen ambos sistemas de salud o si durante los anos ˜ de seguimiento cambiaron de un sistema a otro. Esto generaría que los pacientes reciban más de un tratamiento simultáneamente o tratamientos distintos por cada centro en diversos periodos
Authors: Godoy Carrillo, Maria Claudia; Meneses Saco, Alejandra
Source: Reumatología Clinica (Reumatol Clin)
URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10757/337884
Hemos leído con atención el artículo publicado por el servicio de Reumatología del Hospital José María Cullen de Santa Fe, Argentina1. Nos parece relevante la comparación de la evolución del lupus eritematoso sistémico (LES) en un centro privado y uno público, ya que el desenlace de esta enfermedad se podría ver afectado por diversos factores que involucran estar en cualquiera de los centros mencionados, como el tratamiento farmacológico brindado y las características demográficas de la persona que acude a un centro público y uno privado. Estos factores influyen en la calidad de vida y el grado de actividad de la enfermedad en el paciente2. Sin embargo, el estudio presentado tiene algunas limitaciones que ponen en tela de juicio los resultados reportados. En primer lugar, no se define el momento en que los autores inician el seguimiento de enfermedad de los pacientes. Esto podría sesgar el estudio ya que el pronóstico de supervivencia de LES varía de acuerdo con varios factores, como el grado de actividad de la enfermedad en la que se encuentra la persona, la edad y las comorbilidades en el momento de diagnóstico, entre otras3. Segundo, no se determina si los pacientes son usuarios exclusivos de uno de los sistemas de salud (público o privado), si tienen ambos sistemas de salud o si durante los anos ˜ de seguimiento cambiaron de un sistema a otro. Esto generaría que los pacientes reciban más de un tratamiento simultáneamente o tratamientos distintos por cada centro en diversos periodos
Authors: Godoy Carrillo, Maria Claudia; Meneses Saco, Alejandra
Source: Reumatología Clinica (Reumatol Clin)
URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10757/337884
Low adherence to hemodialysis regime in patients with chronic renal disease in a Peruvian Ministry of Health reference hospital
Objectives:
To describe the frequency and perceived causes of non-adherence to dialysis in a Peruvian national reference public hospital. Design:
Descriptive study. Setting: Nephrology department, Hospital Nacional 2 de Mayo, Lima, Peru. Participants: Patients with more than one
year on dialysis. Interventions: The number of absences to appointed sessions was determined and a validated questionnaire was used
to describe perceptions regarding the causes of absences. Main outcomes measures: Low adherence to dialysis defined as patients
with more than one absence per month or more than 12 absences between July 2012 and July 2013. Results: The study included 54
patients, of which 27 were male. Average age was 57 ± 16.4 years and average time on dialysis was 40.6 ± 11.5 months. Only 7 patients
had higher education. There were 504 absences (5.45%). The second day of the weekly schedule was the day with more absences
(292), followed by the third day (145). Overall 13 patients showed low adherence. Main causes of absence reported included a remote
residence (6/13), feeling good (6/13), and insufficient financial resources to cover transportation costs (5/13). Conclusions: A quarter of
patients had low adherence, and main factors were distance to health facility and wellbeing self-perception.
Authors: Herrera Añazco, Percy; Palacios Guillen, Melissa; Mezones Holguin, Edward; Hernandez, Adrian V.; Chipayo Gonzales, David
Source: Anales de la Facultad de Medicina
URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10757/336754
Authors: Herrera Añazco, Percy; Palacios Guillen, Melissa; Mezones Holguin, Edward; Hernandez, Adrian V.; Chipayo Gonzales, David
Source: Anales de la Facultad de Medicina
URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10757/336754
Validation of a scale to assess contamination at home, study in rural Peru
Objectives: To validate a scale to assess contamination of food at
home and measure the validity and reliability.
Methods: mothers or caregivers with children under 5 years were surveyed
in San Juan de Lurigancho in Lima Peru. The scale was previously
subject to a rating of expert judges. Factor analysis with principal
components was performed; the internal consistency was measured
with Kuder-Richardson Formula 20 (KR-20) and the validity of the test
with the coefficient Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) and the sphericity test
Barlet.
Results: The sample was 194 caregivers. Three components (Practices
cleaning, storage practices and pollution of the child) with a total of
10 items were identified. The item Cleaning Practices had a KR-20 =
0.722 storage practices and food contamination 0.518 and 0.5 respectively.
The validity of the test was KMO = 0.549 and 591,678. Barlet
test, df = 136, (p <0.05).
Conclusions: This scale can contribute to the planning of interventions
in the aspect of pollution in the home and thus reduce episodes of
infections in children.
Authors: Lozada Urbano, Michelle; Rivera, Roger; Miranda, Doris; Gallegos Vergara, Clara; Reyes Villegas, María Ysabel; Xirinachs Salazar, Yanira
Source: Arch Med
URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10757/336526
Authors: Lozada Urbano, Michelle; Rivera, Roger; Miranda, Doris; Gallegos Vergara, Clara; Reyes Villegas, María Ysabel; Xirinachs Salazar, Yanira
Source: Arch Med
URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10757/336526
Mandatory requirement of social health service in Peru: Discriminatory and unconstitutional
The rural and urban-edge health service (SERUMS) is an activity that only health professionals perform for the Peruvian
government, as it is a mandatory requirement to qualify for a second specialty or to work in public hospitals and public
health care facilities, and obtain government scholarships for future training. The few legal changes in the rules of this social
program and the focus of “service” restricted to health professionals lead to a perception of this policy as discriminatory
and unconstitutional because it violates the right to education and work. There is no scientific evidence that supports the
usefulness and effectiveness of this program in terms of quality of service and health indicator improvement, as well as
in adequate distribution and retention of health professionals. We suggest to abolish the compulsory requirement and to
reformulate a political strategy to help attract and retain health professionals in vulnerable areas of Peru.
Authors: Mayta Tristán, Percy; Poterico, Julio A.; Galán Rodas, Edén; Raa Ortiz, Daniel
Source: Rev Peru Med Exp Salud Publica
URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10757/336532
Authors: Mayta Tristán, Percy; Poterico, Julio A.; Galán Rodas, Edén; Raa Ortiz, Daniel
Source: Rev Peru Med Exp Salud Publica
URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10757/336532
Suscribirse a:
Comentarios (Atom)